Subject: | Combination deal automation |
Summary: | *** Teams meeting with Vineet and Sanjay Requirement: - There are two products codes, VP001 $4.50, VP002 $7.00
- When the cashier sells these two items separately, the prices need to be based on the individual prices
- When these two products are sold on the same receipt, we want to be able to have a combine price
Setup: - We have setup kit items that contain the combinations. Example VKIT001 $8.95. This kit has products VP001 and VP002
Workaround: - To achieve the Kit price, the cashier has to remember the two items, remove the individual items and scan the Kit item when a customer has these two items on the receipt.
Change Request: This is same as the workaround with the exception that this will happen automatically when the system recognises the two items are on the receipt - When scanning a product, we check if there is a KIT item wit the same Products and (Quantity * Conversion). If this exists, we do the following:
- Mark the two items as "Deleted"
- Insert the kit item with the KIT price
- Add a note on the "Deleted" items saying "Replaced with VPKIT001"
- This will not apply to Custom Kit Items as custom kits are configurable
Environment details: - https://www.linktechnologies.com.au/DEMO-LinkSOFT-LBS/
- POS configured on LinkQA7
Test Plan 1: - VPKIT001 contains 1xVP001 and 1xVP002
- Scan these two items
- Expected result: VP001 and VP002 should be marked as DELETED and VPKIT001 should be inserted
Test Plan 2: - Scan VP001 twice, then scan VP002
- Expected result: VP001 reduced to 1, VP002 should be marked as DELETED and VPKIT001 should be inserted
- VP001 should have a note: "Reduced by 1 and replaced by VPKIT001
- VP002 should have a note: "Reduced by 1 and replaced by VPKIT001
- Scan VP002
- Expected result: VP001 reduced to 1, the second VP002 should be marked as DELETED and VPKIT001 should be increased by 1
- VP001 should have a note: "Reduced by 1 and replaced by VPKIT001
- The second VP002 should have a note: "Reduced by 1 and replaced by VPKIT001
|
Audit Notes: | Edited by sanjay on 14/01/25 17:42. Edited by sanjay on 14/01/25 12:15. Edited by sanjay on 28/11/24 11:08. Edited by sanjay on 28/11/24 11:04. Edited by sanjay on 28/11/24 10:48. Edited by sanjay on 28/11/24 10:47. |
28 Nov 2024 | 09:48AM Comment 1 by Vineet (Link Business Solutions) This comment has been removed |
28 Nov 2024 | 10:43AM Comment 2 by Sanjay (Link Technologies) This comment has been removed |
28 Nov 2024 | 10:46AM Comment 3 by Sanjay (Link Technologies) Case L13082 added to project 15.60 |
14 Jan 2025 | 12:15PM Comment 4 by Sanjay (Link Technologies) ETC was changed from 28/11/2024 to 28/02/2025 |
04 Feb 2025 | 01:45PM Comment 5 by Sanjay (Link Technologies) Assigned To: Sanjay (Link Technologies) Followup Date: 14-02-2025 01:28 PM Time Taken: 6.00 Notes: Edited by sanjay on 05/02/25 12:30. |
| Hi guys, after discussing this with the team, we have decided to adopt the following design: - Create a new form called "Product Substitution"
- The form will contain three levels:
- Level 1 - Product Substitution Name and Effective Dates
- Level 2 - Item to substitute with
- Level 3 - Items in the POS form that will be used to evaluate the substitution
- The value of the substitution will be based on the LinkSOFT Product Price
- The substituted items will be marked as DELETED
- Test plan 1 and 2 remain unchanged
Reason for design change: - Using Kit Items will raise complexity as Kit Items are not designed for Product Substitution
- Kit Items form does not have the necessary controls, such as "Start/End" dates for Substitution to take effect
|
|