Subject: | The "Call No From" and "Call No To" is not functional on the "Call Listing Report (Summary)" report |
Summary: | Issue: The "Call No From" and "Call No To" is not functional on the "Call Listing Report (Summary)" report Steps - Generate the report with "Call No From" and "Call No To" as 9011. No data appears in the report.
- Generate the report with only "Call No From" filter as 9011. Data appears in the report.
Test Environment - Version - 10.1.2
- Database - LINKSOFTDEMO
- Server - Link008
|
Audit Notes: | Edited by sanjay on 05/03/19 10:38. Edited by rashna on 12/11/18 14:18. |
13 Nov 2018 | 01:13PM Comment 1 by Rashna (Edge Business Solutions) Case 9701 added to project 10.1 |
13 Nov 2018 | 01:17PM Comment 2 by Sanjay (Link Technologies) Assigned To: Development Followup Date: 13-11-2018 01:17 PM Time Taken: 1.00 |
| Development work for this case has been completed. The change will be available in version: 10.1.2.1 1. The following changes were made(Include Database object names, Program classes and any other relevant information):| - Corrected the parameter captions to align with the report procedure
2. The issue was caused by: - Incorrect mapping of report parameter caption and procedure returned invalid data.
3. Next Step - UAT
|
|
13 Nov 2018 | 03:00PM Comment 3 by Rashna (Edge Business Solutions) Assigned To: Alvis (Link Technologies) Followup Date: 13-11-2018 03:00 PM Time Taken: 1.00 |
| Hi Alvis, I can not fully test this case for the below reasons. - The "Comment By" does not generate the correct case. Generate the report with comment by as "Janet". This outputs case number 9278. However, user Janet did not comment on the case.
- The report filters are not correctly displaying reports
- Generate the report with dates as 01/01/2018 to 15/01/2018. Priority as High - Data is generated.
- Remove the priority filter.
- Generate the report. The report is generated as blank.
Test Environment - Version 10.1.2.1
- Database - RASHNA-LINKSOFT-DEMO-10
- Server - 10.0.0.10
Thanks Rashna |
|
15 Nov 2018 | 08:52AM Comment 4 by Sanjay (Link Technologies) Assigned To: Development Followup Date: 15-11-2018 08:52 AM Time Taken: 1.00 |
| Development work for this case has been completed. The change will be available in version: 10.1.2.4 1. The following changes were made(Include Database object names, Program classes and any other relevant information):| - Added notes on "Call Listing" and "Call Analysis" report to state that default "date type" is "logged date"
- Changed "call listing" report procedure to correctly display cases based on "date type filter".
- Corrected report to show data based on "Comment By" parameter.
2. The issue was caused by: - Inconsistent checks were in place showing cases with no comments when "Date Type" parameter value was "comment date"
3. Next Step - UAT
|
|
15 Nov 2018 | 12:45PM Comment 5 by Rashna (Edge Business Solutions) Assigned To: Alvis (Link Technologies) Followup Date: 15-11-2018 12:45 PM Time Taken: 2.00 |
| Hi Alvis QA Results Tests carried out according to requirements specified on the case header Test Results Summary Table 1 - Summarised list of issues No | Test Description | Pass/Fail | 1 | Validate that the report notes are updated to state that default "date type" is "logged date" | Failed. Notes are not updated for Call Listing and Call Analysis. | 2 | Test the date filter, Category, Priority, Group, Status, Logged by, Reference and Group by filters on the Call Listing and Call Analysis report | Pass | 3 | Test the Call No, Comment, Assigned To, Project and Show Details filter on the Call Listing Report | Pass | 4 | Test the "Date Type" on both reports - Close Date
- Comment Date
- Comment Date - Billable
- Expected Completion
- Logged Date
| Test Results
- Close Date - Pass
- Comment Date - Pass
- Comment Date - Billable : Please advise the functionality of this filter. Call Analysis report was generated with dates as 01/01/2018 to 30/01/2018 with date type filter as "Comment Date - Billable". The report output case 9035 with a cost of 0. However, the comment in the case for date 16/01/2018 has a cost of 50. Validate the filter on both Call Listing and Call Analysis reports
- Expected Completion - Pass
- Logged Date - Pass
|
Environment Details - OS version: Windows Server
- Application version: 10.1.2.4
- Setup: Demo
- Server : 10.0.0.10
- Database: RASHNA-LINKSOFT-DEMO-10
Steps to reproduce failed scenarios: N/A Next Step: for corrections
|
|
15 Nov 2018 | 02:27PM Comment 6 by Sanjay (Link Technologies) Assigned To: Rashna (Edge Business Solutions) Followup Date: 15-11-2018 02:27 PM Time Taken: 4.00 |
| Development work for this case has been completed. The change will be available in version: 10.1.2.5 1. The following changes were made(Include Database object names, Program classes and any other relevant information):| - Removed Date Filter: "Comment Date - Billable" as this was used to filter entries that have effort > 0.
- Corrected procedure to display effort and costs
2. The issue was caused by: - Coding/Design error
3. Next Step - UAT
|
|
15 Nov 2018 | 02:37PM Comment 7 by Rashna (Edge Business Solutions) Assigned To: Sanjay (Link Technologies) Followup Date: 15-11-2018 02:37 PM Time Taken: 1.00 |
| Hi Sanjay QA Results Tests carried out according to requirements specified on the case header Test Results Summary Table 1 - Summarised list of issues No | Test Description | Pass/Fail | 1 | Validate that the report notes are updated on the following report - Call Analysis Report
- Call Analysis Report - Excel Output
- Call Listing Report
- Call Listing Report (Summary)
| Pass | 2 | Validate that the "Comment Date - Billable" filter has been removed from the report. | Pass | 3 | Validate that the "Total Hrs", "Total Cost", "Period Hours" and Period Cost are populated in the report | Pass |
Environment Details - OS version: Windows Server 2012
- Application version: 10.1.2.5
- Setup: Demo
- Server : 10.0.0.10
- Database: RASHNA-LINKSOFT-DEMO-10
Steps to reproduce failed scenarios: N/A Next Step: for closure
|
|
16 Nov 2018 | 04:55PM Comment 8 by Sanjay (Link Technologies) Assigned To: Sanjay (Link Technologies) Followup Date: 16-11-2018 04:55 PM |
| Thanks Rashna |
|
09 Oct 2019 | 08:14AM Comment 9 by Sanjay (Link Technologies) Quality control status: Pass. QC Not required - This case was created before quality check was implemented in version 11 on 30/06/2019 |