| Subject: | Function "[dbo].[LT_HRM_LeaveBalance_LIST_fx]()" outputs incorrect results |
| Summary: | Hi Sanjay, The function "[dbo].[LT_HRM_LeaveBalance_LIST_fx]()" outputs incorrect results on the following scenario: The below has been tested in V8.17, in the demo database.
- When the above was executed, E001 appeared in the list.
- We had then deactivated the employee.
- The procedure was executed again, E001 was removed from the list.
- We re-activated the employee, assigned the same leave to him.
- Re-executed the procedure, employee E001 was pushed back into the list.
Issue: The Transaction Report Figure and the Allocation screen figure are not matching because, the procedure is reading the voided balance. The voided balance should not be taken into account. Refer to image below: 
Kindly take a look. Regards
Aarti Gayaneshwar |
| Audit Notes: | |
| 03 Oct 2017 | 11:23AM Comment 1 by Alvis (Link Technologies) Case 8849 added to project 8.19 |
| 03 Oct 2017 | 02:58PM Comment 2 by Alvis (Link Technologies) Case 8849 removed from project 8.19 |
| 03 Oct 2017 | 02:58PM Comment 3 by Alvis (Link Technologies) Case 8849 added to project 8.18 |
| 03 Oct 2017 | 03:56PM Comment 4 by Sanjay (Link Technologies) Assigned To: Development Followup Date: 03-10-2017 03:56 PM Time Taken: 1.00 |
| Issue has been resolved in beta3. |
|
| 04 Oct 2017 | 10:22AM Comment 5 by Aarti Pooja Gayaneshwar (Link Business Solutions) Assigned To: Sanjay (Link Technologies) Followup Date: 04-10-2017 10:22 AM Time Taken: 2.00 |
| QA for product and Patch Releases Step 1 - Developer to system test changes until not issues are found - Alvis and Sanjay to sign off on System Test Step 2 - Product expert allocated by Consulting Manager for Product QA. Consulting Manager to allocate resource Consulting Manager to sign off on UAT and Generic Test
STEP 1 - DETAILS OF QA can be entered in case comments. Summary to be maintained in the table below. Table 1 - Summarised list of issues | No | Issue Description | Resolved? | | 1 | Function outputs correct data | PASSED | | 2 | Issue mentioned in case | PASSED | | 3 | Voided issues are not taken into account | PASSED | | 4 | | | | 5 | | | | 6 | | | | 7 | | | | 8 | | | | 9 | | | | 10 | | | | 11 | | | | 12 | | |
WORKFLOW: - Original case assigned to Development
- When the product is ready for release, System test details are entered into comments and the CASE HEADER Table updated.
- If system test passes, assign case to Consulting Manager for UAT
- If UAT Passes, Assign case for Documentation or close case
|
|
| 09 Oct 2019 | 08:14AM Comment 6 by Sanjay (Link Technologies) Quality control status: Pass. QC Not required - This case was created before quality check was implemented in version 11 on 30/06/2019 |